Paper

Capital of Alternative Financial institutions and Basel II: Credit Cooperatives and Islamic Banks

Why is Basel II inadequate for alternative financial institutions?
Download 6 pages

This paper highlights the inadequacy of Basel II in evolving an appropriate legal and regulatory framework for alternative financial institutions like Islamic Banking and credit cooperatives.The paper argues that:

  • The rules of Basel II apply to conventional financial institutions;
  • Alternative financial institutions operate under different rules and principles;
  • The European Commission aims to bring alternative credit institutions under the ambit of the regulatory regime of conventional financial institutions;
  • It believes that a standardized set of rules should apply through the region's single financial market to facilitate cross-border supervisory cooperation;
  • Basel II is accompanied by the re-examination of the legal and regulatory framework for Islamic Banking, especially those parts related to risk management and the role played by capital;
  • However, there is pressure for the regulation applying to Islamic banks to be as compatible as possible with that for conventional banks.

The paper discusses the main features of:

  • Cooperative credit unions in the European Union;
  • Islamic banking.

The paper concludes that:

  • Basel II refers to items such as callable capital, which are difficult to measure in the case of cooperative credit unions;
  • Islamic banking contains principles that are not a part of conventional banking, one of them being the focus on ethics.

About this Publication

By Cornford, A.
Published