Paper

Building an Honest Microfinance Organization: Embezzlement and the Optimality of Rigid Repayment Schedules and Joint Liability

What is the best response to the possibility of embezzlement?
Download 44 pages

The paper examines the agency problem of staff members managing microfinance programs; those who can abuse their discretion to embezzle borrowers' repayments. The paper addresses the question of 'how an organization that manages so much money in a corrupt society can remain honest'.The paper argues that:

  • In poor countries, most borrowers of microfinance are illiterate;
  • Means of transportation are primitive;
  • They depend on the bank's representative to get information about their loans;
  • This creates scope for misconduct and embezzlement.

The paper:

  • Studies the optimal lending contract and the optimal supervisory contract;
  • Assumes away any adverse selection or moral hazard at the level of the borrower;
  • Explains two main features of the contracts used by the Grameen Bank - rigid repayment schedules and joint liability - as optimal responses to the bank staff's agency problem;
  • Considers a simple model of hierarchy - a lender, a supervisor and borrower;
  • Assumes that, when a cheating supervisor is discovered, the lender can recover the original payment made by the borrower, but cannot impose a fine on the supervisor because of limited liability.

The paper concludes that:

  • Joint liability is the optimal response to the embezzlement problem;
  • If borrowers can sign a side-contract for mutual insurance, the outcome of the optimal rigid contract under joint liability can also be achieved under individual liability.

About this Publication

By Jeon, D., Menicucci, D.
Published