FinEquity Blog

Dgroups Dialogue Recap

What Are We Learning About Psychosocial Sources of Resilience and Why They Matter For Women?
Photo credit: Orlando Ducay Jr.

Last month, FinEquity organized an online discussion about why psychosocial sources of resilience like agency, decision-making, confidence and aspirations are important for women who take part in women’s groups (like VSLAs or savings groups) and livelihood and/or financial inclusion initiatives.  We wanted to explore a few aspects of this topic with our community. Firstly, whether members have considered psychosocial factors when designing or implementing women’s groups or other financial inclusion initiatives and what they have learned. Second,  we wanted to understand the existing gaps in evidence needed to inform programming and investments to support these factors. Lastly, we wanted to ask if there were opportunities to put some of these learning questions to the test. 

During the discussion, we heard from researchers and implementers about what they were learning and how those findings begin to untangle how psychosocial factors interact with financial inclusion programs, and lessons we can apply to designing and evaluating future programs. For those who could not join us on Dgroups for the virtual discussion, we’ve recapped some of the highlights shared, along with some of the questions posed to the FinEquity community that we can continue to explore together. Lastly, we include a list of relevant resources contributed by community members.  


Mercy Corps shared an evidence review that found that Self Help Groups and women’s groups more broadly can have substantial consequences for a range of women’s psychosocial factors (in combination with economic benefits facilitated through participation in the groups). Looking forward, they are designing a program and mixed methods study around psychosocial factors (i.e., social solidarity/ connectedness, aspiration, women’s empowerment) in South Sudan, drawing on literature on community-based approaches to microfinance and poverty graduation approaches. 

Questions to explore: 

  • If you have intentionally programmed around psychosocial factors through women’s groups, are there any lessons you can share?  
  • For evaluators, how are you contending with all the challenges related to causal inferences (self-selection bias, balancing randomization design with self-led nature of these groups etc.)?  

ideas42 shared a discussion paper with PEI on low-cost, light-touch tweaks rooted in behavioral science that can be applied to economic inclusion programs in order to improve outcomes for women by reducing barriers around identity and agency to participation in programs. They also shared a brief of a labor market program in Liberia discussing strategies for program design to challenge perceptions around women participating in traditionally male-dominated fields. 

Questions to explore: 

  • What standard / how rigorous must evidence be for program designers to incorporate such interventions into their programs? 

Is it necessary that evidence is derived from a trial in the specific context of that program to inform scale, or is it sufficient if an intervention has proven effective in a similar context (perhaps in a different country)? 


Village Enterprise shared a study of their graduation program in Uganda showing increased decision-making within the household and improved standing within the community led to a greater sense of hope and overall happiness for women entrepreneurs. They are also planning to measure women’s agency in an upcoming randomized control trial of the DREAMS (Delivering Resilient Enterprises and Market Systems) for Refugees project. 

Questions to explore: 

  • What are others doing to measure intra-household dynamics?  

UC Davis shared several findings from studies of the BOMA project’s Rural Entrepreneur Access Project (REAP) in Kenya. In addition to the graduation program’s positive impacts on assets, income and savings, the research highlighted the significant role that psychological assets (i.e., skills, self-confidence, aspirations and mental health) play in complementing  economic interventions and improving outcomes for women. The baseline mental health of program participants is also a crucial factor. Findings showed that women with severe depressive symptoms did not have the same financial benefits. This resulted in a call to action to rethink program design, including the addition of a suggested screening for mental health issues and considering treatment options before offering women the additional opportunity (and stress) of financial assets. 


 Lastly, below is a list of resources shared during this and previous discussions on the topic. 

Relevant Resources

Leave a Comment

Comments on this page are moderated by FinDev Editors. We welcome comments that offer remarks and insights that are relevant to the post. Learn More