Paper
What Would Leland Stanford Do?
Can microfinance serve two masters- poverty and profits?
Download
20 pages
This editorial commentary argues that Compartamos's initial public offering (IPO) is a warning that microfinance is going awry. The commentary makes the following points in support of its argument:
- A responsible social investor needs to realize that in microfinance markets the poor people bear all the costs;
- Microfinance investment decisions should be made with careful due diligence and a realistic understanding of local market conditions;
- Microfinance institutions (MFIs) should lower the rates for customer-borrowers instead of profiteering on behalf of shareholders or investors;
- The Compartamos IPO brings into focus a lack of transparency for social investors;
- Social investors have an obligation to determine if their investments are being repaid with predatory interest rates;
- MFIs that depend on private market financing will be under pressure to de-emphasize holistic, all-inclusive anti-poverty microfinance programs.
The editorial commentary concludes that:
- There is more to microfinance than making money
- There is something unseemly about wealthy individuals and institutions earning excessive returns off the unbearably poor;
- The Compartamos IPO is a radical departure in core purpose, objective and intention;
- Microfinance should remain a platform for wiping out the scourge of poverty.
About this Publication
Published