Paper

The Cost of Poverty Alleviation Transfer Programs: A Complete Analysis of Three Programs in Latin America

How best to compare program costs against effectiveness?
Download 37 pages

This paper addresses the criticism faced by antipoverty programs  that of high share of administrative (non-transfer) costs in comparison to their effectiveness. It proposes and implements a replicable methodology for a comparative cost analysis of three similar poverty alleviation programs in Latin America:

  • Programa Nacional de Educacin Salud y Alimentacin (PROGRESA) in Mexico,
  • Programa de Asignacin Familiar-Fase II (PRAF) in Honduras,
  • Red de Proteccin Social (RPS) in Nicaragua.

The study assesses the cost efficiency of these programs and points out that:

  • There is little rigorous empirical evidence on the costs and cost structures of social safety net programs;
  • Improved information and a better understanding of the program costs are crucial for effective policymaking;
  • Analysis of programs with high initial fixed costs lead to different conclusions at different stages of maturity, and in different time periods.

Further, the paper assesses the cost-efficiency of PROGRESA, PRAF, and RPS by focusing on the cost-transfer ratio, defined as the ratio of non-transfer costs (administrative costs) to transfers.The findings from the study underscore that in order to make a credible assessment of cost-efficiency, a detailed analysis of program cost structures that goes well beyond simply providing aggregate cost information, is required.

About this Publication

By Caldes, N., Coady, D., Maluccio, J.
Published